IRC Chat : 2012-02-03 - OpenMRS

00:50:29 *** sunbiz has quit IRC
00:58:55 *** wyclif has joined #openmrs
03:08:45 *** morristic has quit IRC
03:09:16 *** morristic has joined #openmrs
03:45:34 *** morristic has quit IRC
04:49:35 *** morristic has joined #openmrs
05:03:30 *** suranga has joined #openmrs
05:05:47 *** matt_uofa has joined #openmrs
05:09:44 <matt_uofa> Hello, hoping someone here can help me. I'm trying to setup an install of OpenMRS 1.6.5 with the MDR-TB 2.1.8. I've got everything installed and running, but when I load a patient and click the "see MDR-TB overview for this patient" I get the following error. "org.openmrs.module.mdrtb.regimen.RegimenType cannot be cast to org.openmrs.module.mdrtb.regimen.RegimenType", anyone have any ideas? :-)
05:50:30 *** bryq has joined #openmrs
05:50:30 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v bryq
05:55:40 *** bryq has quit IRC
06:12:20 *** morristic has quit IRC
06:12:47 *** morristic has joined #openmrs
06:35:38 *** robbyoconnor has quit IRC
06:54:45 *** robbyoconnor has joined #openmrs
06:54:45 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v robbyoconnor
06:59:03 *** morristic has quit IRC
07:04:19 *** morristic has joined #openmrs
07:07:56 *** kishoreyekkanti has joined #openmrs
07:08:36 *** morristic has quit IRC
07:25:26 *** matt_uofa has quit IRC
07:44:27 *** dkayiwa has joined #openmrs
08:43:51 *** dkayiwa_ has joined #openmrs
08:44:36 *** dkayiwa has quit IRC
08:44:36 *** dkayiwa_ is now known as dkayiwa
08:52:57 *** bryq has joined #openmrs
08:52:57 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v bryq
09:06:05 *** sunbiz has joined #openmrs
09:06:05 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v sunbiz
09:44:49 *** kishoreyekkanti_ has joined #openmrs
09:48:06 *** suranga has quit IRC
09:48:09 *** kishoreyekkanti has quit IRC
09:48:09 *** kishoreyekkanti_ is now known as kishoreyekkanti
10:04:30 *** bryq has quit IRC
10:20:34 *** dkayiwa_ has joined #openmrs
10:23:56 *** dkayiwa has quit IRC
10:23:56 *** dkayiwa_ is now known as dkayiwa
10:48:18 *** kishoreyekkanti has quit IRC
10:48:36 *** kishoreyekkanti has joined #openmrs
11:00:20 *** morristic has joined #openmrs
11:28:27 *** rafa has joined #openmrs
11:28:27 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v rafa
11:38:41 *** sunbiz has left #openmrs
11:38:45 <OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: OpenMRS Modules: Data Entry Statistics 1.3.2 uploaded to OpenMRS Module Repository <https://dev.openmrs.org/modules/view.jsp?module=dataentrystatistics&ampversion=&amp1.3.2>
11:46:19 *** morristic has quit IRC
12:07:43 *** robbyoconnor has quit IRC
12:32:40 *** james_regen has joined #openmrs
12:32:40 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v james_regen
13:04:25 *** kishoreyekkanti has quit IRC
13:10:54 *** rafa has quit IRC
13:12:01 *** rafa has joined #openmrs
13:12:01 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v rafa
13:13:05 *** rafa has quit IRC
13:20:22 *** dkayiwa_ has joined #openmrs
13:23:06 *** dkayiwa has quit IRC
13:24:44 *** dkayiwa_ has quit IRC
13:28:05 *** liz_ has joined #openmrs
13:29:33 <liz_> hi
13:30:19 <liz_> anyone in here
13:32:58 <james_regen> hi liz_ at least one person is here
13:38:52 <liz_> hi james
13:39:12 <liz_> have some problems while installing openmrs
13:39:29 <liz_> http://pastebin.com/reZzmesj
13:41:21 *** dkayiwa has joined #openmrs
13:42:40 <james_regen> i'm not sure i can help. once other people show up others might have ideas
13:44:50 <liz_> okay, will wait
13:45:24 <dkayiwa> liz_: what were you asking?
13:49:15 *** sgrannis has joined #openmrs
13:49:15 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v sgrannis
13:49:56 <liz_> am doing installation of openmrs
13:50:04 <liz_> and ending with this
13:50:06 <liz_> http://pastebin.com/reZzmesj
13:50:18 <dkayiwa> liz_: how are you installing it?
13:50:45 <sgrannis> james: how's the data extract for Joanne coming?
13:50:47 <liz_> i checked out openmrs to eclipse
13:51:29 <liz_> now i need to install openmrs,
13:51:40 <james_regen> sgrannis: it should be down today. i need to go through 4 files to get everything together, but i think i'll get it right
13:51:53 <dkayiwa> liz_: what url do you use in the browser?
13:52:10 <liz_> http://localhost:8080/openmrs
13:52:58 <dkayiwa> liz_: and what do you see in the browser?
13:53:32 <liz_> am getting the wizard as usul
13:53:39 <james_regen> sgrannis: well, i might need to do some more work. i have scores for the pairs, but not the vectors, so i'll have to look those up. and i have to double check if i have the full output file instead of jus the 5 percent sample
13:53:39 <sgrannis> Thanks for working on the extract. I should have my SSN pairs finished shortly as well
13:53:52 <dkayiwa> liz_: can you proceed with the wizard steps?
13:53:55 <liz_> meant usual
13:54:18 <liz_> go to the end and then having those errors
13:54:21 <liz_> http://pastebin.com/reZzmesj
13:54:34 <dkayiwa> liz_: do you have mysql installed and running?
13:54:44 <liz_> yes
13:55:02 <liz_> the browser ends with: http://localhost:8080/openmrs/index.htm
13:55:14 <liz_> and then errors
13:55:18 <dkayiwa> liz_: at what wizard step do you get the error?
13:55:39 <james_regen> sgrannis: since i have the raw data files, though, whatever jessica has andy don't have i should be able to recreate to get exact pair counts for the block and figure out overall vector counts
13:56:22 <liz_> it goes up to the poing where it loads data to the database, and then says something like finalising installation
13:56:30 <liz_> meant point
13:56:57 <dkayiwa> liz_: what error message does it display in the browser?
13:57:25 <liz_> in the browser, nothing is displayed after that
13:58:06 <sgrannis> James: didn't follow your last
13:58:17 <dkayiwa> liz_: when a step before the page where stuff fails, can you clear the console output before you now execute the failing step such that i can see a clean log output?
13:59:53 <james_regen> sgrannis: the file we manually reviewed was a 5 percent sample of the LNFN block. jessica made the full output file and did the sampling for review. i'm not sure if we ever got the full output file she sampled from, which i think is needed for the <# not classified> field in the file
14:02:07 <james_regen> sgrannis: we did clean the files she used, though, and we still have the full raw data file she deduped. if i need to do something with the 200k pairs that were sampled to get the 10k we reviewed, i should be able to recreate the file jessiea sampled from
14:02:14 *** sgrannis has quit IRC
14:05:30 *** sgrannis has joined #openmrs
14:05:30 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v sgrannis
14:20:35 *** rafa has joined #openmrs
14:20:35 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v rafa
14:24:11 *** MarkG has joined #openmrs
14:25:20 <MarkG> wyclif: did you ever get git to work for you yesterday?
14:26:58 <dkayiwa> MarkG: as wyclif responds, as for HTML-218, do we have use cases where one would on the same form, selectively turn on or off showing date format for certain date widgets? Am comparing this with simply using a global property.
14:27:43 <dkayiwa> MarkG: global property vs widget attribute. or simply do both :)
14:28:10 <dkayiwa> MarkG: where widget attribute overrides global property value :)
14:28:12 <MarkG> dkayiwa: i will look at the ticket and refresh my memory...
14:28:20 <dkayiwa> :D
14:35:30 <MarkG> dkayiwa: let's just do a global property, htmlformentry.showDateFormat, even those this isn't what the ticket said, since this is what we ended up doing for
14:35:36 <MarkG> !ticket HTML-36
14:35:38 <OpenMRSBot> MarkG: [#HTML-36] htmlformentry: change date widget formatting - OpenMRS JIRA - https://tickets.openmrs.org/browse/HTML-36
14:36:10 <dkayiwa> MarkG: ok
14:38:04 <MarkG> dkayiwa: also, bonus points if you can get it work well displaying in the text field itself, instead of off to the side, per Darius's comment, but this is not a requirement so definitely don't waste too much time if it is problematic to get it work with the date widget
14:38:32 <dkayiwa> MarkG: ok
14:39:54 *** sgrannis has quit IRC
14:40:11 <wyclif> hi MarkG yes i did
14:42:29 *** sgrannis has joined #openmrs
14:42:38 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v sgrannis
14:42:55 <MarkG> wyclif: greast
14:49:59 *** kishoreyekkanti has joined #openmrs
15:21:36 *** dkayiwa has left #openmrs
15:28:10 *** MedMan has joined #openmrs
15:29:36 *** MedMan has quit IRC
15:29:54 *** sgrannis has left #openmrs
16:09:14 <MarkG> wyclif rafa: looks like your IDE is formatting the HFE code... probably not a bad thing, but it can make it difficult to read changesets... for the files you work on, do you mind formatting and committing before you make changes and then making your changes in a separate commit? thanks...
16:09:39 <wyclif> MarkG, sure
16:09:47 <rafa> MarkG: I try not to do that anymore
16:09:51 <rafa> MarkG: which commit?
16:12:08 <rafa> MarkG: ahh yes, I have an auto formatting, sorry :/
16:12:47 <MarkG> yeah, we probably should have gone through an auto-formatted HFE at some point, but we haven't... thanks...
16:21:16 *** liz_ has quit IRC
16:27:17 <wyclif> hi MarkG
16:29:53 <MarkG> wyclif: hey Wyclif, what's up?
16:32:15 <wyclif> MarkG, i see that when adding attribute descriptors only subclasses of OpenmrsObject are allowed, how do i add boolean?
16:32:56 <wyclif> attributes and how do i define allowed values or it goes in validation logic
16:33:39 <MarkG> wyclif: all attribute descriptors are used for so far are to allow forms to be shared... so they just need to be added for attributes that reference openmrs objects
16:34:39 <MarkG> wyclif: attribute values go in validation logic...
16:35:00 <MarkG> wyclif: fyi, there is a bit about attribute descriptors at the bottom of this apge
16:35:10 <MarkG> https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/docs/HTML+Form+Entry+Module+Technical+Overview
17:34:36 *** suranga has joined #openmrs
17:34:50 <suranga> hi james_regen :-)
17:35:09 <james_regen> hi
17:38:30 <djazayeri> rafa: what could we do about validating twice? We definitely want to do it in the service as a fail-safe, and we definitely want to populate the errors object for the controller. I don't see a way to make that happen in the service's save.
17:48:45 <wyclif> hi MarkG
17:49:26 <MarkG> wyclif: hey wyclif, what's up?
17:49:45 <wyclif> for HTML-246, doe stateIds have to be one of state_id, uuid, pref name or all
17:50:07 <wyclif> MarkG, for HTML-246, doe stateIds have to be one of state_id, uuid, pref name or all
17:50:14 <wyclif> MarkG, for HTML-246, does stateIds have to be one of state_id, uuid, pref name or all
17:51:31 <wyclif> MarkG, and i though a patient can only be in one state per workflow in a program, does it mean that the multiple states provided will be matched per workflow?
17:51:45 <rafa> djazayeri: hi! we could try to save first and if it fails validate in the controller :)
17:51:49 <MarkG> wyclif: you should definately be able to specify a state by uuid or id
17:52:03 <djazayeri> rafa: interesting idea...
17:52:18 <MarkG> wyclif: ellen also asked to be able to specify it by the preferred name of the underlying concept (the way you can for workflow)
17:52:27 <djazayeri> rafa: I was just going to open up the snapshot and see what part of validation is slow, and see if we can speed that bit up
17:52:40 <rafa> djazayeri: it's getConceptsByName
17:52:52 <MarkG> wyclif: but i'd be willing to skip that for now since the ProgramWorkflow API is pretty bad...
17:52:54 <rafa> djazayeri: from ConceptDao
17:53:35 <MarkG> wyclif: fyi, i believe the HtmlFormEntryService has both a getByUuid and getById method that you can use...
17:53:59 <djazayeri> rafa: hmm…that's the part that's preventing two concepts from having the same fully_specified or preferred name in a locale?
17:54:15 <rafa> djazayeri: yes
17:54:32 <djazayeri> perhaps that query can be optimized
17:55:07 <MarkG> wyclif: if i understand your other question, if two of the states in the stateIds list are in the same workflow, that should be an error case...
17:55:34 <MarkG> wyclif: i forget how tags handle error cases (prob throw an exception) but you can probably find an example in another tag
17:56:37 <djazayeri> rafa: you're leading the sprint today, right?
17:56:38 <rafa> djazayeri: it looks good to me
17:56:52 <rafa> djazayeri: yes in 5 minutes :)
17:57:08 <djazayeri> FYI I've managed to schedule a phone call for the same time so I'll paste my update but not be following closely (if at all)
17:57:35 <rafa> cool
17:57:37 <djazayeri> remember to ask MarkG to give a comment on how we're doing on the overall sprint, now that we're halfway done.
17:59:05 <MarkG> i think things are going well... we are making good progress through tickets...
17:59:25 <wyclif> MarkG, mark what did you mean to skip for now
18:00:07 <MarkG> wyclif: i mean it is okay if you can only specify a state by id or uuid, but not by preferred concept name
18:00:27 *** kishoreyekkanti has quit IRC
18:01:32 <rafa> !scrumon rafa
18:01:32 * OpenMRSBot says the DAILY SCRUM MEETING is STARTING. This meeting should not last longer than 15 minutes. Please hold other comments until the end of the meeting, or message someone privately. Thank you! ScrumMaster rafa- you may begin when ready.
18:01:43 <rafa> hi djazayeri, magicaltrout, wyclif
18:01:49 <rafa> hi MarkG :)
18:02:05 <rafa> today's order: djazayeri, MarkG, wyclif, me
18:02:34 <wyclif> ok
18:03:38 <rafa> I guess djazayeri is setting up for the call so go ahead MarkG
18:04:16 <MarkG> * started to play around with htmlform release-tests
18:04:24 <djazayeri> sorry, here's my
18:04:25 <djazayeri> update
18:04:28 <djazayeri> Thursday 2-Feb-2012
18:04:28 <djazayeri> * Developers call
18:04:28 <djazayeri> * Leadership call
18:04:28 <djazayeri> * Applied TRUNK-3032
18:04:28 <djazayeri> * Commented on and/or closed some 1.9 tickets
18:04:28 <djazayeri> * Re-created the HFE eclipse projects
18:04:28 <djazayeri> * plan for pentaho sprint
18:04:29 <djazayeri> * Fixed HTML-287 (a bug I introduced with datepicker changes)
18:04:29 <djazayeri> * Fixed HTML-288 (another bug I introduced with date picker changes)
18:04:30 <djazayeri> * Dealt with some code@openmrs.org requests.
18:04:31 <djazayeri> Friday 3-Feb-2012
18:04:31 <djazayeri> * Call with Captricity and Andy Kanter about integration
18:04:32 <djazayeri> * Check whether I've also broken the id + javascript set value with my datepicker changes
18:04:32 <djazayeri> * Do some sprint tickets not caused by my own bugs
18:04:33 <djazayeri> logging off now so I don't get beeps
18:04:40 *** djazayeri has left #openmrs
18:05:04 <rafa> ~-+99768128+-~okay continue MarkG :)
18:05:40 <MarkG> * reviewing HFE tickets in Review State
18:05:46 <MarkG> * misc Haiti support
18:05:58 <MarkG> * will continue to review tickets and explore release-tests this afternoon
18:06:09 <MarkG> i think the sprint is going well, and we've made good progress
18:06:40 <rafa> 5 tickets left right? or are there any other needing desing?
18:06:45 <MarkG> one risk is that it is mainly the more difficult tickets that are left, but that is somewhat unavoidable because we didn't get them into Ready for Work state right away
18:07:01 <MarkG> also it was probably good for people to do easy tickets first...
18:07:26 <MarkG> i see 6 six tickets as ready for work
18:07:32 <MarkG> 3 in progress
18:07:35 <MarkG> 1 needs assessment
18:07:46 <rafa> MarkG: cool
18:07:51 <rafa> wyclif: you're up
18:07:54 <wyclif> thursday(i wasn't that productive):
18:07:54 <wyclif> * dev call
18:07:54 <wyclif> * Got blocked for a while about GIT commits, i kept on losing my changes in the process
18:07:54 <wyclif> * HTML-246 - Update Enrollment in Program to allow a date input, and to set current states
18:07:54 <wyclif> Friday:
18:07:55 <wyclif> * Complete work on HTML-246 and add tests for the tag in line with the changes
18:07:56 <wyclif> * I plan to FINALLY release SMART module since i had no feedback from the DEVs i emailed on monday
18:07:58 <wyclif> * Code review for trunk tickets
18:08:00 <wyclif> No Blocker though i feel like i still get slowed by the git workflows\
18:08:25 <rafa> wyclif: have you seen http://wiki.eclipse.org/EGit/User_Guide?
18:08:33 <rafa> wyclif: it's a good tutorial to egit/git
18:08:42 <rafa> okay my turn:
18:08:50 <rafa> Today:
18:08:50 <rafa> * Committed:
18:08:50 <rafa> + HTML-264: Test forms that modify a Patient and an Encounter at the sames
18:08:50 <rafa> https://tickets.openmrs.org/browse/HTML-264
18:08:50 <rafa> + HTML-283: Fix problem with entering a form that creates a new encounter but also edits an existing patient record
18:08:50 <rafa> https://tickets.openmrs.org/browse/HTML-283
18:08:50 <rafa> + HTML-286: Add master div to an HTML Form
18:08:51 <rafa> https://tickets.openmrs.org/browse/HTML-286
18:08:51 <rafa> No blockers.
18:09:25 <rafa> Possible topics to discuss: git workflows
18:09:28 <rafa> !scrumoff
18:09:28 * OpenMRSBot says the DAILY SCRUM MEETING has ENDED. This channel is now returned to normal hacking operations. Post-scrum meeting follow-up conversations may now begin.
18:09:29 <MarkG> wyclif: looks like i got the Address test to run... i had to add openmrs-servlet to the context
18:09:44 <wyclif> MarkG, cool
18:09:53 <rafa> wyclif: do you have any specific question regarding git?
18:10:11 <wyclif> i later figured out the things last evening
18:10:35 <wyclif> rafa, how to create a review
18:10:47 <wyclif> rafa in githug
18:10:50 <wyclif> rafa in github
18:11:10 <rafa> wyclif: we use comments on commits for that
18:11:20 <wyclif> MarkG, but that tells me that the it is still specific to 1.6,
18:11:31 <rafa> wyclif: if you go to the github tab on the ticket
18:11:42 <rafa> wyclif: and click on commit's uuid
18:11:48 <wyclif> rafa yes
18:11:57 <rafa> wyclif: you can see a diff where you can review and add comments
18:12:06 <rafa> wyclif: it's all we have at the moment
18:12:38 <wyclif> rafa, cool thanks
18:13:03 <rafa> wyclif: you're welcome
18:15:18 <wyclif> MarkG, was that for 1.6 or later?
18:15:59 <MarkG> wyclif: got it working on 1.6... going to run through all the tests shortly...
18:16:13 <MarkG> wyclif: all tests against all versions, that is
18:17:28 *** djazayeri has joined #openmrs
18:17:38 *** ChanServ sets mode: +o djazayeri
18:18:03 <wyclif> MarkG, does this mean you are having 2 versions of the openmrs-servlet.xml file , one for 1.6 and for the other
18:20:26 <MarkG> wyclif: i am just including it at the top of the test file using the @ContextConfiguration annotation... not sure exactly where this pulls it from...
18:22:35 <wyclif> MarkG, in older versions i know that the address lay out is pulled from the openmrs-servlet and that is why it finally worked after that inclusion, in 1.8 it was changed to pull it from a GP table
18:24:11 <wyclif> MarkG, and i was thinking the test should probably consider set the GP before running it in case it a 1.8 or later
18:25:27 <wyclif> MarkG, but in the web app that is taken care of inside the logic of getDefaultLayout
18:29:14 <MarkG> wyclif: hmm, yeah, we will see what happens against 1.10
18:32:22 <wyclif> MarkG, it will probably pass simply because the default layout in case the GP is blank which actually contains all the fields i included in the test, A more concrete test would set the GP with a template with specific fields and in the unit test it asserts that ONLY the defined fields are populated and the ret are null
18:33:14 <wyclif> MarkG, ret ->rest
18:45:01 *** lh has joined #openmrs
18:45:14 *** lh has joined #openmrs
19:05:35 <wyclif> hi MarkG
19:11:06 <MarkG> wyclif: hey, what's up?
19:11:46 <wyclif> MarkG, what is the point of the user to specify states and we can get the intial states from the work flow itself after all we wont accept anyhing besides the initial?
19:12:50 <wyclif> MarkG, i can loop through all the workflows and set the intial state for each
19:13:52 <MarkG> wyclif: are workflows not allowed to have more than one initial state?
19:14:17 <wyclif> hmm, good question
19:14:24 <wyclif> MarkG, hmm, good question
19:14:33 <MarkG> wyclif: my assumption was that they are...
19:14:41 <MarkG> wyclif: and i think they can via the UI
19:14:52 <MarkG> wyclif: but, yes, if they can't, there is no point in having them specified in the tag
19:16:14 <wyclif> djazayeri, MarkG and i wanted to know if a workflow can have multiple initial and terminal states
19:20:22 <wyclif> MarkG,
19:20:42 <djazayeri> wyclif: there are allowed to be multiple *possible* initial and terminal states in a workflow
19:20:52 <djazayeri> it's also possible for a state to be both initial, and intermediate.
19:21:21 <djazayeri> so it's possible that one patient is in two different initial states in the same workflow (at different times)
19:22:21 <wyclif> djazayeri, meaning a state can have multiple initial states, right?
19:22:39 <MarkG> wyclif: yes...
19:22:47 <wyclif> thank guys
19:22:53 <wyclif> thanks guys
19:22:55 <MarkG> np
19:23:38 <djazayeri> wyclif: a patient's list of states can have multiple initial ones
19:26:43 <wyclif> djazayeri, in the samw workflow?
19:26:49 <wyclif> djazayeri, in the same workflow?
19:27:19 <MarkG> wyclif: a patient can only be in one state in a given workflow at any time, but a workflow may have many possible initial states
19:28:11 <wyclif> i got that, djazayeri 's last comment almost got me thinking otherwise
19:28:19 <wyclif> MarkG, i got that, djazayeri 's last comment almost got me thinking otherwise
19:30:38 <MarkG> question for anyone--
19:30:53 <djazayeri> (I'm on a phone call for next 10 mins)
19:31:18 <MarkG> I;m working on a test for HFE that needs to access the default address template
19:31:46 <MarkG> originally, this wasn't working, however i was able to get it working by adding:
19:31:57 <MarkG> @ContextConfiguration(locations = { "classpath:openmrs-servlet.xml"}, inheritLocations = true)
19:32:04 <MarkG> at the top of the respective class file
19:32:32 <MarkG> the thing is, when i run all the tests, tests in classes that are executed after the class I added @ContextConfiguration to fail...
19:32:56 <MarkG> anyone know how to deal with it... I tried @DirtiesContext on the last test in that class
19:34:32 <MarkG> rafa: do you think i should move this test back into the omod project? is this possible?
19:40:02 <djazayeri> MarkG: if the test requires openmrs-servlet.xml, then I think it should be in the omod.
19:40:31 <MarkG> djazayeri: thanks... that is what i thought
19:40:49 <djazayeri> wyclif: the "initial" flag on State (which is metadata) just means "is this allowed to be the first state that a patient is in for its workflow.
19:41:15 <djazayeri> e.g. for a treatment status workflow you might have made "needs assessment" and "in treatment" both allowed initial states.
19:42:00 <wyclif> ok
19:42:16 <MarkG> rafal: do you know if there are any special instructions i need to follow to add some new testse into the omod project of a module?
19:42:52 <djazayeri> wyclif: when we're talking about an individual patient, the only thing that matters is that their first PatientState in a workflow should be have state.initial == true. besides that, we ignore state.initial.
19:43:28 <rafa> MarkG: It shoud work if you simply put it in src/test/java
19:43:29 <wyclif> djazayeri, ok
19:44:08 <rafa> MarkG: I'm not sure about your tricky test profiles
19:44:26 <MarkG> rafa: i will have to copy over the testApplicationContext, etc, correct?
19:45:04 <rafa> MarkG: hmm it may be necessary
19:45:27 <rafa> MarkG: we could write a method to do that automatically
19:45:55 <rafa> MarkG: I mean copying needed test resources
19:46:12 <rafa> MarkG: but for now just try to make it work
19:46:31 <rafa> MarkG: or write a ticket and assign it to me :)
19:46:46 <MarkG> rafa: you asked for it... :)
19:46:48 <rafa> MarkG: I'll deal with it on Monday
19:46:51 <rafa> though
19:46:52 <rafa> ;)
19:54:29 <MarkG> rafa: i think i will take a first pass and if it fails, leave it to you...
20:02:10 <OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: On Twitter: OpenMRS: #OpenSource Tackles #Healthcare In Places Microsoft Can't: http://t.co/WUncTWOu #HealthIT #eHealth #ICT4D #OpenMRS #HFOSS #FOSS <http://twitter.com/OpenMRS/statuses/165524040180699136>
20:38:13 *** suranga has quit IRC
21:01:42 <lh> impressive
21:11:00 *** bryq has joined #openmrs
21:11:00 *** ChanServ sets mode: +v bryq
21:19:44 <MarkG> rafa: is there a way I can include classes in test in my api project as dependencies in my omod project?
21:22:39 <MarkG> rafa: looks like i can just package up my test-jar...
22:01:44 *** james_regen has quit IRC
22:27:41 *** rafa has quit IRC
22:40:37 *** bryq has quit IRC
22:42:35 *** MarkG has left #openmrs