00:17:25
|
*** mandric has quit IRC
|
00:32:17
|
*** mandric has joined #openmrs
|
01:00:00
|
*** goutham has joined #openmrs
|
01:06:22
|
*** goutham has quit IRC
|
01:09:37
|
*** wyclif has joined #openmrs
|
01:10:17
|
*** goutham has joined #openmrs
|
01:25:41
|
*** nribeka has quit IRC
|
02:07:36
|
*** goutham has quit IRC
|
02:38:02
|
*** guduji has joined #openmrs
|
03:05:56
|
*** guduji has quit IRC
|
03:21:09
|
*** mccallumg has joined #openmrs
|
03:21:09
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v mccallumg
|
03:52:29
|
*** pratyush has joined #openmrs
|
04:10:30
|
*** surangak has joined #openmrs
|
04:11:15
|
<surangak> mccallumg, hi
|
04:11:25
|
<surangak> mccallumg, very sorry about t being late today
|
04:11:40
|
<surangak> mccallumg, things are rather hectic over here.. :P
|
04:12:48
|
<mccallumg> no problem
|
04:13:12
|
<mccallumg> surangak: how's it goin?
|
04:14:23
|
<surangak> mccallumg, burke had answerd my mail
|
04:14:31
|
<surangak> mccallumg, still have to read it in detail
|
04:14:54
|
<surangak> mccallumg, today new set of intern have arrived at office, im supposed to oversee em
|
04:15:02
|
<surangak> mccallumg, was running about all day :D
|
04:15:16
|
<mccallumg> surangak: ok. i haven't seen that response. was I cc'd on it?
|
04:15:45
|
<surangak> mccallumg, oh i see, he has cc'd it to the dev list...
|
04:16:02
|
<mccallumg> surangak: when you build your branch with maven, do you run the tests?
|
04:16:06
|
<surangak> mccallumg, let me forward that to you...
|
04:16:14
|
<surangak> mccallumg, yes,
|
04:16:25
|
<mccallumg> surangak: no,no. i'll look atthe list
|
04:16:25
|
<surangak> mccallumg, so far there are no test faliures
|
04:16:38
|
<surangak> mccallumg, but five test errors...
|
04:16:43
|
<surangak> yesterday i fixed one..
|
04:17:04
|
<surangak> mccallumg, so now only 4 test faliures
|
04:17:15
|
<mccallumg> mccallumg: i'm getting a failure but it is probably my setup
|
04:18:00
|
<mccallumg> surangak: i'll keep looking at it. do you need to go take care of your interns?
|
04:18:03
|
<surangak> mccallumg, what is the error msg ?
|
04:18:14
|
<surangak> mccallumg, they can survive for an hour without me
|
04:18:30
|
<surangak> mccallumg, unless they approach the Architect by mistake :D
|
04:18:41
|
<mccallumg> Failed tests:
|
04:18:41
|
<mccallumg> handle_shouldNotUnvoidTheOrdersAndEncountersThatNeverGotVoidedWithThePatient(org.openmrs.api.handler.PatientDataUnvoidHandlerTest)
|
04:19:08
|
<surangak> mccallumg, aha, yes, you're getting that too...
|
04:19:17
|
<surangak> mccallumg, let me explain that...
|
04:19:47
|
<surangak> mccallumg, i seem to be getting that even if i check out the latest tunk and run it without a single chance
|
04:20:09
|
<surangak> mccallumg, according to our integration test, all the tests are working
|
04:20:36
|
<surangak> mccallumg, i talked to ben about this,, but he was not getting it... we assumed that i was getting it because of some form of localization problem
|
04:20:44
|
<mccallumg> surangak: interesting. so it is doing it on the trunk too
|
04:20:54
|
<surangak> mccallumg, for now im ignoring that test with a @ignore
|
04:20:58
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: New Changeset: OpenMRS (order-entry): Follow up to API support for Discontinuing orders and fixing unit tests in OrderServiceTest - TRUNK-2367 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/ws0ey-uvlVo/OpenMRS>
|
04:21:11
|
<surangak> mccallumg, since it does not affect the changes i am making to the branch
|
04:21:32
|
<surangak> mccallumg, but if you are also getting it, i better look into it some more
|
04:21:50
|
<surangak> for now, as a quick fix, how about adding @ ignore..
|
04:21:57
|
<surangak> mccallumg, i will follow this up...
|
04:22:38
|
<surangak> mccallumg, or alternatively, do this..
|
04:22:55
|
<surangak> mccallumg, mvn clean install -Dmaven.test.skip=true
|
04:23:07
|
<surangak> mccallumg, to ignore tests
|
04:23:17
|
<mccallumg> mccallumg: yes. that ignores all tests
|
04:28:00
|
<surangak> mccallumg, ah, burke has responded to both e mails i see
|
04:36:31
|
<mccallumg> surangak: just sent an email to you with maven failure message (I understand if now isn't the best time. :)
|
04:36:43
|
<surangak> mccallumg, hi, i just got it
|
04:37:03
|
<surangak> mccallumg, mm.. can you tell me the exact command you are running...
|
04:37:13
|
<surangak> mccallumg, from the root ?
|
04:38:53
|
<mccallumg> surangak: I'm using m2e. Right click on openmrs maven module. Run as > Maven build ... (parameters - clean install)
|
04:40:31
|
<mccallumg> surangak: pardon me. not parameters. Goals = clean install
|
04:40:53
|
<surangak> mccallumg, mmm... give me a minute to check that... u r a Mac user right ?
|
04:41:29
|
<mccallumg> surangak: yes. I'm doing this on my mac
|
04:43:33
|
<mccallumg> surangak: no hurry. we can talk more on the weekend.
|
04:44:59
|
<surangak> mccallumg, hi, i was trying to figure out what the problem was..
|
04:45:14
|
<surangak> mccallumg, i think it should be a set up problem
|
04:46:15
|
<mccallumg> surangak: yes. I'm sure. It seems more people are skipping the tests during maven build (from looking at this thread: http://openmrs-mailing-list-archives.1560443.n2.nabble.com/Maven-build-of-openmrs-api-fails-td6220118.html)
|
04:46:21
|
<OpenMRSBot> <http://ln-s.net/8xf_> (at openmrs-mailing-list-archives.1560443.n2.nabble.com)
|
04:46:37
|
<surangak> mccallumg, all tests take 5-6 minutes to run
|
04:46:46
|
<surangak> mccallumg, so they usually run tests before committing
|
04:46:51
|
<mccallumg> surangak: right
|
04:47:18
|
<surangak> mccallumg, i was wondering, in eclipse,where you set the goal, is your maven config displayed properly ?
|
04:48:08
|
<surangak> mccallumg, something like D:\JavaIDEs\springsource-tool-suite-2.6.0.RELEASE-e3.6.2-win32-1\springsource\maven-2.2.1.RELEASE\conf\settings.xml
|
04:48:47
|
<mccallumg> surangak: it is the eclipse wizard so I don't actually see the maven command. should I?
|
04:49:30
|
<surangak> mccallumg, mm... are you using the bundled in maven in your ide, or have u installed exxternally ?
|
04:49:48
|
<mccallumg> surangak: just m2e in eclipse ...
|
04:49:55
|
*** gbastien has quit IRC
|
04:50:13
|
<surangak> mccallumg, go windows ->preferences - >maven -> installations
|
04:50:34
|
<surangak> mccallumg, you will need maven to run it, im afraid...
|
04:50:44
|
<mccallumg> surangak: I do have maven on the command line
|
04:51:42
|
<surangak> mccallumg, mm.... did u try running maven from the command line ?
|
04:52:02
|
<surangak> mccallumg, instead of going through ecplise...
|
04:52:12
|
<mccallumg> surangak: I'll try that ... tomorrow
|
04:52:21
|
<surangak> mccallumg, sorrry, still trying to figure out the problem, mine seems to run ok...
|
04:52:38
|
<surangak> mccallumg, no problem, ill try to figure out what is happenin...
|
04:52:45
|
<mccallumg> surangak: no worries. It is time for me to retire anyway.
|
04:53:00
|
<mccallumg> surangak: I'll be in touch over the weekend. I'm sure
|
04:55:45
|
*** pratyush has left #openmrs
|
04:56:52
|
<mccallumg> surangak: bye
|
04:57:25
|
<surangak> mccallumg, bye glen, sorry about that.. ill look into the two issues today...
|
04:57:50
|
<mccallumg> surangak: there's nothing for you to look into. I'm sure it is setup on my end.
|
05:05:57
|
*** mccallumg has quit IRC
|
05:14:06
|
*** dkayiwa has joined #openmrs
|
06:10:46
|
*** bwolfe has joined #openmrs
|
06:10:46
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o bwolfe
|
06:16:00
|
*** mathiaslin has joined #openmrs
|
06:57:19
|
*** pascal` has joined #openmrs
|
07:16:22
|
*** bwolfe has quit IRC
|
07:16:41
|
*** upul` has joined #openmrs
|
07:16:41
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v upul`
|
07:17:53
|
*** bwolfe has joined #openmrs
|
07:17:53
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o bwolfe
|
07:23:09
|
*** bwolfe has quit IRC
|
07:25:26
|
*** bwolfe has joined #openmrs
|
07:25:26
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o bwolfe
|
07:35:41
|
*** bwolfe has quit IRC
|
07:40:56
|
*** bwolfe has joined #openmrs
|
07:40:56
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o bwolfe
|
07:46:03
|
*** bwolfe has quit IRC
|
07:58:47
|
*** bwolfe has joined #openmrs
|
07:58:47
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o bwolfe
|
08:01:47
|
*** gauravpaliwal has joined #openmrs
|
08:01:47
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v gauravpaliwal
|
08:02:23
|
<gauravpaliwal> what is the alternative to this if I need data back from the portlet to the controller <property name="successView"><value>redirect:newjsp.portlet</value></property>
|
08:02:25
|
<gauravpaliwal> ?
|
08:02:38
|
<gauravpaliwal> bwolfe: Hi
|
08:02:51
|
<gauravpaliwal> what is the alternative to this if I need data back from the portlet to the controller <property name="successView"><value>redirect:newjsp.portlet</value></property> ?
|
08:02:53
|
<bwolfe> hey
|
08:03:41
|
<gauravpaliwal> bwolfe : what is the alternative to this if I need data back from the portlet to the controller <property name="successView"><value>redirect:newjsp.portlet</value></property> ?
|
08:03:44
|
<bwolfe> you mean from the controller to the portlet again?
|
08:04:08
|
<gauravpaliwal> from portlet to the controller
|
08:04:45
|
<bwolfe> successview is for after the controller receives the submission
|
08:05:00
|
<bwolfe> your portlet needs to submit to a different url
|
08:05:11
|
<gauravpaliwal> okey cool !
|
08:05:13
|
<bwolfe> just create a new controller and set to form action url to be that controller
|
08:06:09
|
<gauravpaliwal> I have done that :) and it works :) ,
|
08:10:36
|
<bwolfe> portlets are meant to be readonly
|
08:10:38
|
<bwolfe> displayonly
|
08:12:26
|
<gauravpaliwal> okeys..
|
08:33:32
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: OpenMRS Forum: Customizing OpenMRS <http://forum.openmrs.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=788#p2986> || New Changeset: OpenMRS (trunk): IN PROGRESS - issue TRUNK-2428: ConcurrentModificationException in ConceptNameSaveHandler ... <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/W6FyqXTv-UY/OpenMRS> || Shazin Sadakath: First Class <http://shazsterblog.blogspot.com/2011/07/first-class.html>
|
08:58:34
|
<surangak> so as you all can see by the latest update by openmrs bot, Shazin just won himself a first class....
|
08:58:49
|
<surangak> and we're all very pleased about it over here in Sri Lanka...
|
09:19:28
|
*** gauravpaliwal has quit IRC
|
09:47:43
|
*** surangak has quit IRC
|
10:02:36
|
<bwolfe> congrats to shazin!
|
10:02:49
|
<bwolfe> where is he btw.. ? I haven't seen him for a long while...
|
10:03:24
|
<pascal`> shazin++
|
10:03:31
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v pascal`
|
10:04:34
|
<pascal`> bwolfe, tried out the g+ mobile app?
|
10:04:42
|
<pascal`> no iphone release "yet".
|
10:04:53
|
<bwolfe> I don't have an invite for it
|
10:05:13
|
<bwolfe> and I'm not really into the social scene anyway. I feel like if I swear off facebook I need to sweat off g+ ;-)
|
10:06:33
|
<pascal`> bwolfe, sure, but you have to at least try it out
|
10:15:51
|
*** mandric_ has joined #openmrs
|
10:15:52
|
*** mandric has quit IRC
|
10:15:54
|
*** mandric_ is now known as mandric
|
10:29:28
|
*** james_regen has joined #openmrs
|
10:29:37
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v james_regen
|
10:31:09
|
*** surangak has joined #openmrs
|
10:31:48
|
<surangak> bwolfe, i see i just got unassigned from an old introductory ticket...
|
10:32:55
|
<bwolfe> surangak, yeah, cleaning things up
|
10:33:06
|
<bwolfe> if you still are doing it, feel free to reclaim it. :-)
|
10:33:13
|
<surangak> bwolfe, there were a few more tickets like that...
|
10:33:22
|
<bwolfe> that you own?
|
10:33:29
|
<bwolfe> can you unassign yourself if you're not working on them?
|
10:33:30
|
<surangak> bwolfe, but i guess you're right.. someone new might turn up and do them now
|
10:33:40
|
<surangak> bwolfe, let me go through them
|
10:34:04
|
<surangak> bwolfe, later on, after gsoc, ill be too old for introductory tickets :P
|
10:34:37
|
<bwolfe> very true
|
10:35:49
|
<surangak> bwolfe, ill go through the tickets today - tomorrow morning and do that... :-)
|
10:36:43
|
<bwolfe> ok, thanks!
|
11:06:07
|
<surangak> bwolfe, by the way, shazin just graduated
|
11:06:29
|
<dkayiwa> who is shazin?
|
11:06:35
|
<bwolfe> I know, did you not see my comment after your previous one about it? :-)
|
11:15:21
|
*** rafa has joined #openmrs
|
11:15:21
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v rafa
|
11:15:24
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: New Changeset: OpenMRS (webapp-testing): Added changes from APPTEST-48, APPTEST-34, APPTEST-38, APPTEST-36, APPTEST-3, APPTEST-39 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/ib6KTlShIX8/OpenMRS> || New Changeset: OpenMRS (order-entry): Adding a UI widget for choosing an Orderable - TRUNK-2383 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/TX_kN32HJEQ/OpenMRS> || OpenMRS Forum: Re: Customizing OpenMRS <http://forum.openmrs.org/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=788#p2987>
|
11:15:27
|
*** Echidna has quit IRC
|
11:15:53
|
<surangak> dkayiwa, he is like. the guy who got me intrested in OpenMRS
|
11:16:04
|
<dkayiwa> oh i see!!! :)
|
11:16:08
|
<surangak> dkayiwa, i have a big case of hero worship on him :)
|
11:16:17
|
<dkayiwa> hahahah :D
|
11:18:05
|
*** upul` has left #openmrs
|
11:24:48
|
*** Echidna has joined #openmrs
|
11:24:48
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v Echidna
|
11:50:08
|
*** dkayiwa has quit IRC
|
11:54:07
|
*** dkayiwa has joined #openmrs
|
12:05:02
|
*** bryq has joined #openmrs
|
12:05:02
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v bryq
|
12:05:32
|
*** bwolfe has quit IRC
|
12:08:07
|
*** bwolfe has joined #openmrs
|
12:08:07
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o bwolfe
|
12:08:34
|
*** bryq has quit IRC
|
12:17:49
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: New Changeset: OpenMRS (order-entry): Added a minor change to getOrders dao method to exclude voided orders TRUNK-2365 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/q7uoUgQJ8yI/OpenMRS>
|
12:31:43
|
*** downeym has joined #openmrs
|
12:31:43
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o downeym
|
12:31:43
|
*** OpenMRSBot sets mode: +o downeym
|
12:32:00
|
*** wyclif has quit IRC
|
12:38:42
|
*** bwolfe has quit IRC
|
12:41:50
|
<rafa> dkayiwa: Have you ever used ValidateUtil.validate() explicitly before saving?
|
12:41:59
|
<dkayiwa> yes
|
12:44:24
|
*** r4friedman has joined #openmrs
|
12:44:49
|
*** r4friedman is now known as r-friedman
|
12:45:04
|
<r-friedman> djazayeri: are you really there?
|
12:45:26
|
<rafa> dkayiwa: My problem is that when I call it, it doesn't validate the given object.
|
12:45:44
|
<rafa> dkayiwa: Do I have to setup something before calling validate?
|
12:46:22
|
<rafa> dkayiwa: I'm stepping through with a debugger and it actually does not find any Validators.
|
12:48:28
|
<dkayiwa> rafa: i remember you need to add your validator to the ValidateUtil in some .xml config file
|
12:48:57
|
<r-friedman> downeym: mike, are you actually there?
|
12:48:58
|
<rafa> dkayiwa: I want to use Concept validator which should be there already.
|
12:50:49
|
<dkayiwa> let me cross check
|
12:54:11
|
<dkayiwa> are you using trunk?
|
12:54:59
|
<rafa> dkayiwa: no, 1.7 branch
|
12:55:53
|
<dkayiwa> do you have this: <bean class="org.openmrs.validator.ValidateUtil">
|
12:56:07
|
<dkayiwa> in applicationContext-service.xml
|
12:56:09
|
*** gauravpaliwal1 has joined #openmrs
|
12:57:19
|
<dkayiwa> i think it was removed from trunk. but could be still existing in 1.7
|
12:57:57
|
<rafa> dkayiwa: it's not there
|
12:58:23
|
<rafa> there're specific bean validators declared though
|
12:58:31
|
<downeym> r-friedman: yep.
|
12:58:48
|
<r-friedman> hey mike, did paul pick up the pkg at the front desk?
|
12:59:03
|
<downeym> r-friedman: I wasn't aware I had one waiting for me :)
|
12:59:07
|
<downeym> oh, paul
|
12:59:10
|
<downeym> no....
|
12:59:19
|
<downeym> do you know when it was received?
|
12:59:26
|
<r-friedman> it was for everyone, why don't you follow up on it -- yesterday afternoon
|
12:59:40
|
<dkayiwa> rafa: i think the validation strategy which uses the ValidateUtil was changed in newer versions
|
12:59:51
|
<r-friedman> 2:44pm by Moore
|
13:00:06
|
<downeym> r-friedman: i'll call her
|
13:00:41
|
<rafa> dkayiwa: Okay, thanks. I'll continue to play with a debugger to see what happens.
|
13:00:47
|
<dkayiwa> ok
|
13:02:40
|
<dkayiwa> rafa: when you call ValidateUtil.validate, does ValidateUtil.getValidators get called?
|
13:02:54
|
<rafa> yes
|
13:03:21
|
<dkayiwa> rafa: and does it find any validator?
|
13:03:28
|
<rafa> no
|
13:03:43
|
<rafa> I'm stepping through org.openmrs.util.HandlerUtil.getHandlersForType(Class<H>, Class<T>) right now
|
13:03:56
|
<dkayiwa> which validator did you want to be found?
|
13:04:12
|
<rafa> ConceptValidator
|
13:05:26
|
<rafa> It's not returned by Context.getRegisteredComponents(handlerType)
|
13:06:27
|
<dkayiwa> and which object do you pass in ValidateUtil.validate?
|
13:06:35
|
<rafa> dkayiwa: Okay, I think I see where's the problem. Validators need to be specified explicitly in applicationContext-service.xml
|
13:06:46
|
<rafa> ConceptValidator is not there for unknown reason
|
13:06:59
|
<dkayiwa> ok
|
13:07:24
|
<rafa> dkayiwa: Thanks for hints :)
|
13:07:32
|
<dkayiwa> not much
|
13:13:14
|
*** guduji has joined #openmrs
|
13:14:47
|
<guduji> djazayeri: i have a question
|
13:16:04
|
*** bwolfe has joined #openmrs
|
13:16:04
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o bwolfe
|
13:17:03
|
<guduji> bwolfe: hi :)
|
13:17:33
|
<guduji> i m still stuck with that problem on selenium testing
|
13:17:52
|
<guduji> did you get my url of pastebin?
|
13:19:05
|
<bwolfe> hi ankur
|
13:19:08
|
<guduji> hi
|
13:19:16
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: New Changeset: OpenMRS (obs-codes-expanded): Crude fix to ObsValidator - redo this later <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/mMv1EgYNeOc/OpenMRS>
|
13:19:37
|
<bwolfe> paste it here?
|
13:19:55
|
<guduji> oh ok
|
13:20:09
|
<guduji> u want the release-test script right?
|
13:20:53
|
<guduji> #!/bin/bash
|
13:20:53
|
<guduji> function usage() {
|
13:20:53
|
<guduji> cat <<HELP
|
13:20:53
|
<guduji> usage: $0 [OPTION]
|
13:20:53
|
<guduji> Following are the options:
|
13:20:53
|
<guduji> -i Execute the test in integration mode (default mode is smoke)
|
13:20:55
|
<guduji> -t <test> 'test' is the name of the testcase to be run
|
13:20:57
|
<guduji> -v To enable verbose logging
|
13:20:59
|
<guduji> -b Runs test in virtual buffer
|
13:21:01
|
<guduji> -u mysql username to use (defaults to "openmrs")
|
13:21:03
|
<guduji> -p mysql password to use (defaults to "test")
|
13:21:05
|
<guduji> -o OPENMRS username to use (if executing a single test)
|
13:21:07
|
<guduji> -w OPENMRS password to use (if executing a single test)
|
13:21:11
|
<guduji> -h Prints usage
|
13:21:13
|
<guduji> HELP
|
13:21:15
|
<guduji> }
|
13:21:17
|
<guduji> export MAVEN_OPTS="-Xmx1024m -Xms256m -XX:MaxPermSize=256m"
|
13:21:19
|
<guduji> dir=`dirname $0`
|
13:21:21
|
<guduji> cd $dir
|
13:21:23
|
<guduji> error=1
|
13:21:25
|
<guduji> success=0
|
13:21:27
|
<guduji> verbose="-q"
|
13:21:29
|
<guduji> buffer=false
|
13:21:31
|
<guduji> testname="*"
|
13:21:33
|
<guduji> profile="smoke-test"
|
13:21:35
|
<guduji> mysqlusername="openmrs"
|
13:21:37
|
<guduji> mysqlpassword="test"
|
13:21:41
|
<guduji> omrsusername="admin"
|
13:21:43
|
<guduji> omrspassword="Admin123"
|
13:21:45
|
<guduji> while getopts t:ivbhu:p:o:w: options
|
13:21:47
|
<guduji> do
|
13:21:49
|
<guduji> case $options in
|
13:21:49
|
<dkayiwa> [:)
|
13:21:51
|
<guduji> t ) testname=$OPTARG;;
|
13:21:53
|
<guduji> i ) profile="integration-test";;
|
13:21:55
|
<guduji> v ) verbose="";;
|
13:21:57
|
<guduji> b ) buffer=true;;
|
13:21:59
|
<guduji> u ) mysqlusername=$OPTARG;;
|
13:22:01
|
<guduji> p ) mysqlpassword=$OPTARG;;
|
13:22:03
|
<guduji> o ) omrsusername=$OPTARG;;
|
13:22:05
|
<guduji> w ) omrspassword=$OPTARG;;
|
13:22:07
|
<guduji> h ) usage
|
13:22:11
|
<guduji> exit $success;;
|
13:22:13
|
<guduji> \? ) usage
|
13:22:15
|
<guduji> exit $error;;
|
13:22:17
|
<guduji> esac
|
13:22:19
|
<guduji> done
|
13:22:21
|
<guduji> mvn_command="mvn integration-test -DskipTests -P $profile -Dtest=$testname $verbose -Dmysql_username=$mysqlusername -Dmysql_password=$mysqlpassword -Dopenmrs_username=$omrsusername -Dopenmrs_password=$omrspassword"
|
13:22:23
|
<dkayiwa> d:)
|
13:22:24
|
<guduji> echo Running $mvn_command
|
13:22:26
|
<guduji> echo "Use -v option for verbose mode if you run into errors"
|
13:22:28
|
<guduji> runcommand=$mvn_command
|
13:22:30
|
<guduji> # now run the tests in a hidden browser window (requires app called "xvfb") if the -b option has been passed
|
13:22:33
|
<guduji> if [ $buffer = true ]; then
|
13:22:35
|
<guduji> # kill other open xvfb-run processes
|
13:22:37
|
<guduji> pkill -9 -f Xvfb
|
13:22:41
|
<guduji> runcommand="xvfb-run $mvn_command"
|
13:22:43
|
<guduji> fi
|
13:22:45
|
<guduji> $runcommand
|
13:22:47
|
<guduji> http://pastebin.com/sTUK6Txw
|
13:22:49
|
<guduji> url for pastebin
|
13:23:58
|
<dkayiwa> that was a long one :D
|
13:24:53
|
*** wyclif has joined #openmrs
|
13:26:20
|
<guduji> dkayiwa: you saying that to me? :)
|
13:26:25
|
<dkayiwa> yes
|
13:26:28
|
<dkayiwa> :)
|
13:26:31
|
<guduji> oops sorry
|
13:28:49
|
*** jkeiper has joined #openmrs
|
13:32:45
|
*** docpaul has joined #openmrs
|
13:33:05
|
<downeym> r-friedman:
|
13:33:07
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o docpaul
|
13:33:14
|
<docpaul> 1pin1pinballhi roger!
|
13:33:18
|
<guduji> bwolfe: ^^
|
13:33:35
|
*** gauravpaliwal1 has left #openmrs
|
13:33:38
|
<dkayiwa> jkeiper: welcome to IRC :)
|
13:33:39
|
<docpaul> er, hi roger!
|
13:33:42
|
<bwolfe> docpaul, looks like you have a stuttering problem
|
13:33:46
|
<r-friedman> docpaul: hi paul
|
13:33:53
|
<r-friedman> downeym: ni mike
|
13:33:59
|
<docpaul> roger, you sent something to me? :)
|
13:34:03
|
<docpaul> or to us?
|
13:34:14
|
<r-friedman> to y'all care of you
|
13:34:14
|
<docpaul> it wouldnt have anything to do with games, would it?
|
13:34:20
|
<r-friedman> hehe
|
13:34:25
|
<r-friedman> trying to reduce productivity
|
13:34:38
|
<docpaul> was it an icade?
|
13:34:44
|
<r-friedman> yassah
|
13:34:51
|
<downeym> r-friedman++
|
13:35:00
|
<docpaul> wow, that freaks me out
|
13:35:01
|
* downeym takes the rest of the day off
|
13:35:14
|
<docpaul> because i thought that came from zeshan and nareesa
|
13:35:36
|
<docpaul> thanks roger!
|
13:35:38
|
<r-friedman> if it came yesterday afternoon, it was from me
|
13:35:41
|
<r-friedman> my pleasure
|
13:35:46
|
<r-friedman> enjoy
|
13:36:09
|
<jkeiper> dkayiwa, thank you ... thank you ... *bow*
|
13:36:09
|
<r-friedman> want openmrs to be envy of regenstief e-health
|
13:36:33
|
<docpaul> well, an arcade machine is a step in that direction LD
|
13:36:36
|
<docpaul> er, :D
|
13:37:29
|
<docpaul> what made you think of that? :)
|
13:37:45
|
<docpaul> it's just so wierd that others around here were talking about it was well!
|
13:37:50
|
<bwolfe> ...and why didn't you send one to the Eldoret Regenstrief office ?
|
13:37:56
|
<downeym> r-friedman has the place bugged :D
|
13:38:00
|
<r-friedman> cause y'all are biggest nest of ipad users
|
13:38:24
|
<r-friedman> haha, have you tried to get through Kenyan customs?
|
13:38:35
|
<docpaul> uh, yes. :D
|
13:38:51
|
<downeym> good luck with that
|
13:39:07
|
<bwolfe> I walk through it just fine ;-)
|
13:39:20
|
<bwolfe> sending anything of value via post however...
|
13:40:23
|
<r-friedman> i'm always carrying stuff to my ghana compadres
|
13:40:40
|
<r-friedman> last trip I had 5 1T hard drives
|
13:40:54
|
<bwolfe> heh
|
13:41:12
|
<r-friedman> but having our purchasing people ship 1 PC to Kenya was a bitch
|
13:41:15
|
<bwolfe> I think the biggest thing walked through kenya was a $8000 2u server
|
13:41:54
|
<r-friedman> Emory SPH has a number of international short courses
|
13:42:08
|
<bwolfe> guduji, I don't know why thats hanging for you. do other tests hang? did you see I committed some of your tests to the branch today? (including that drug one, since you put it in the other patches)
|
13:42:10
|
<r-friedman> When folks leave, they inevitably are carrying large flat screen TVs
|
13:42:24
|
*** mandric has quit IRC
|
13:42:41
|
<guduji> oh i did
|
13:42:48
|
<guduji> yes the other tests also give the same problem :(
|
13:43:05
|
<guduji> its just that it opens two tabs.. and then hangs dont know why
|
13:43:19
|
<guduji> i have two more test done if this problem is solved :S
|
13:44:00
|
<bwolfe> try a clean build ?
|
13:44:24
|
<guduji> you mean mvn clean ok
|
13:45:31
|
<bwolfe> yes
|
13:45:55
|
<bwolfe> also make sure there aren't any mysql or jetty instances still running in the bg
|
13:46:14
|
<bwolfe> before the commit I made there was a problem with the failed tests leaving mysql in the bg
|
13:47:51
|
<guduji> oh for that do i have to make some change in my files?
|
13:48:10
|
<guduji> cuz i just kill those instances on my terminal
|
13:48:30
|
*** pascal` has quit IRC
|
13:49:55
|
*** gbastien has joined #openmrs
|
13:53:32
|
<bwolfe> guduji, with my latest commit they should go away
|
13:53:38
|
<bwolfe> killing them at terminal is about the same
|
13:54:21
|
*** gbastien has quit IRC
|
13:56:53
|
<guduji> oh ok
|
13:57:10
|
<guduji> but i m still facing the same problem after doing a clean build too :/
|
13:57:52
|
<guduji> (why did i upgrade my ubuntu)
|
13:57:55
|
<bwolfe> strange
|
13:58:02
|
<bwolfe> ha
|
13:58:16
|
<bwolfe> it was workign before the upgrade?
|
13:58:20
|
<guduji> yep
|
13:58:23
|
<guduji> working perfectly fine
|
14:02:17
|
<guduji> bwolfe: does it also opens up two tabs on the same browser window for you as well?
|
14:02:23
|
*** pascal` has joined #openmrs
|
14:04:12
|
<bwolfe> yes, if I don't use -b
|
14:04:16
|
<bwolfe> two tabs is ok
|
14:04:21
|
<bwolfe> its the not closing part that is bad :-p
|
14:04:37
|
<bwolfe> you can install xvfb and try using it in the bg with the -b flag
|
14:07:14
|
*** gbastien has joined #openmrs
|
14:20:54
|
*** pascal` has quit IRC
|
14:21:06
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: New Changeset: OpenMRS (order-entry): API support for finding active orders for a patient - TRUNK-2365 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/1GY867Flt5w/OpenMRS>
|
14:26:30
|
<guduji> oh ok i will look into it
|
14:26:45
|
*** mandric has joined #openmrs
|
14:27:05
|
*** surangak has quit IRC
|
14:27:54
|
*** mandric has quit IRC
|
14:29:15
|
*** mandric has joined #openmrs
|
14:30:00
|
*** mandric has joined #openmrs
|
14:31:47
|
<guduji> bwolfe: i tried with -b .. it still hangs in between.. as if waiting for something
|
14:31:58
|
<bwolfe> strange
|
14:32:11
|
*** downeym has quit IRC
|
14:32:20
|
*** mandric has joined #openmrs
|
14:32:26
|
<guduji> hm... i will try to reinstall my browser and see
|
14:32:45
|
<bwolfe> guduji, did you confirm that no mysql or jetty or chrome is hanging around?
|
14:34:21
|
<guduji> yes
|
14:34:25
|
<guduji> and there is one more strange thing
|
14:34:43
|
<guduji> no matter what test i run... it always start with story of managing concept drugs
|
14:34:48
|
<guduji> may be thats the reason
|
14:35:03
|
<guduji> but i just changed the story.java file
|
14:35:21
|
<bwolfe> changed story to do what?
|
14:35:33
|
<guduji> story.java with the chrome driver
|
14:35:37
|
<bwolfe> oh, I see
|
14:35:40
|
<guduji> as you suggested day before yesterday
|
14:35:45
|
<guduji> yep
|
14:35:51
|
<bwolfe> yes, def strange if its always starting with that one
|
14:36:16
|
<guduji> how about i check out the webapp branch again and the paste my new files there to see?
|
14:36:30
|
<bwolfe> I can't think of why it'd do that or any other possible solution than a "mvn clean"
|
14:36:49
|
<guduji> yeah i did mvn clean too.. but still the same
|
14:37:03
|
<bwolfe> guduji, are you sure its building correctly? Any compile errors in the release-test branch?
|
14:38:23
|
<guduji> yep building correctly
|
14:38:39
|
<guduji> i do mvn install -DskipTests=true
|
14:39:20
|
<rafa> djazayeri: let me know when you have some time
|
14:39:56
|
<djazayeri> rafa: 5 mins
|
14:40:03
|
<rafa> perfect
|
14:42:34
|
*** downeym has joined #openmrs
|
14:42:34
|
*** OpenMRSBot sets mode: +o downeym
|
14:42:34
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o downeym
|
14:43:37
|
<guduji> wyclif: for trunk 235, how do i retrieve the information from the my profile page to be used in the index page
|
14:44:36
|
<guduji> like after going to my profile i click on the check box.. then that data i need it in the openmrssearch.js file to write a function to assign it to the new variable in that file
|
14:48:21
|
<dkayiwa> hi djazayeri
|
14:49:33
|
<dkayiwa> djazayeri: when filling an order, Burke suggested a filler with format: identifier::authority
|
14:50:24
|
<dkayiwa> djazayeri: so my question is, does that lead to getUserId + "::" authority ? if so, what is the value for authority?
|
14:52:16
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: OpenMRS Modules: i2b2 Export 1.0.5 uploaded to OpenMRS Module Repository <https://dev.openmrs.org/modules/view.jsp?module=i2b2export&version=&1.0.5>
|
14:53:04
|
<djazayeri> dkayiwa: for a local user in the db, say the authority is LOCAL
|
14:53:48
|
<djazayeri> rafa: I'm ready
|
14:54:23
|
<rafa> djazayeri: ok, let's start
|
14:54:42
|
<rafa> so the current state is:
|
14:54:47
|
<rafa> If it is the first import
|
14:54:47
|
<rafa> Defaults to merge if incoming date changed > existing date changed (needs to be confirmed)
|
14:54:47
|
<rafa> Defaults to omit if incoming date changed <= existing date changed (is confirmed)
|
14:54:47
|
<rafa> Defaults to merge if we cannot determine the dates (needs to be confirmed)
|
14:56:11
|
<rafa> My main rule is that omit is safe so we don't need to confirm that, but merge is unsafe and we ask to confirm
|
14:56:33
|
<djazayeri> That sounds right
|
14:56:42
|
<rafa> Do you want to compare it with next imports?
|
14:56:53
|
<djazayeri> We really do need to find a way to show more properties on the confirmation page
|
14:57:07
|
<djazayeri> otherwise it's pretty tricky for the user to decide
|
14:57:17
|
<djazayeri> This is in the case where we've matched on UUID?
|
14:57:26
|
<rafa> yes
|
14:57:27
|
<djazayeri> Actually, back up a step
|
14:57:39
|
<djazayeri> This is for the situation that we're importing something with a UUID we already have
|
14:57:46
|
<rafa> correct
|
14:57:48
|
<djazayeri> and it's the first time metadata sharing has imported it?
|
14:57:53
|
<rafa> correct
|
14:58:59
|
<djazayeri> Yeah, I agree that if the uuid is the same, we should determine the behavior based on dateChanged.
|
14:59:08
|
<djazayeri> And we should require confirmation for overwriting
|
14:59:22
|
<djazayeri> (unless they chose the "prefer to overwrite" option at the very beginning.
|
14:59:32
|
<rafa> Yes
|
14:59:41
|
<rafa> They'll see everything green then
|
15:00:29
|
<rafa> But in that case should we always default to merge?
|
15:00:32
|
*** downeym sets mode: +v yanokwa
|
15:00:36
|
*** downeym sets mode: +v wyclif
|
15:00:38
|
*** downeym sets mode: +v r-friedman
|
15:00:43
|
*** downeym sets mode: +v dkayiwa
|
15:00:46
|
*** downeym sets mode: +v asgoyal_
|
15:00:49
|
<rafa> Or leave omit for the one case?
|
15:00:50
|
*** downeym sets mode: +v jkeiper
|
15:00:54
|
*** downeym sets mode: +v mathiaslin
|
15:01:04
|
<downeym> man, you guys need to register with nickserv. :P
|
15:01:07
|
<djazayeri> leave omit for the case where dateModified is exactly equal.
|
15:01:43
|
<djazayeri> So, the meaning of that option is "I am importing a package from someone who I actually trust to do metadata management for me, and I'm not really managing this stuff myself"
|
15:02:06
|
<rafa> Ok
|
15:02:25
|
<djazayeri> I.e. it should support the use case where Mark is pushing out an update to all users of the MDR-TB module, or Andy is pushing out an update to people using the MVP dictionary.
|
15:02:25
|
<rafa> We should probably write that sentence :)
|
15:02:33
|
<djazayeri> I agree, copy it down. :-)
|
15:02:54
|
<djazayeri> so in that case we really do not want to ask for confirmation.
|
15:03:05
|
<rafa> Clear
|
15:03:17
|
<djazayeri> (but we omit in the case that dateChanged is exactly the same)
|
15:03:39
|
<rafa> Yes, to prevent unnecessary updates in the db
|
15:04:17
|
<djazayeri> exactly
|
15:04:21
|
<rafa> Okay let's consider next imports for the same uuids
|
15:04:26
|
<rafa> If it is not the first import
|
15:04:26
|
<rafa> Defaults to merge if last import date < existing date changed (is confirmed if previously was merge)
|
15:04:26
|
<rafa> Defaults to merge if incoming date changed > last import date changed (is confirmed if previously was merge)
|
15:04:27
|
<rafa> Defaults to omit if incoming date changed <= last import date changed (is confirmed)
|
15:04:27
|
<rafa> Defaults to merge if we cannot determine the dates (needs to be confirmed)
|
15:06:37
|
<djazayeri> Is this just for identical uuids? or also uuids that have been mapped?
|
15:06:56
|
<rafa> It's just for identical uuids
|
15:07:02
|
*** dkayiwa_ has joined #openmrs
|
15:07:24
|
<rafa> Things that have been mapped always get previously chosen action at the moment.
|
15:07:56
|
<rafa> We should probably change that.
|
15:08:26
|
<djazayeri> So, that sounds fine to me.
|
15:08:42
|
<djazayeri> I suspect Andy and Roger might say we should default to omit in case 1 and 4
|
15:08:54
|
<djazayeri> but I think merge is fine for now
|
15:09:00
|
*** dkayiwa has quit IRC
|
15:09:00
|
*** dkayiwa_ is now known as dkayiwa
|
15:09:38
|
<rafa> So the first case is if you modify your data after import and try to import things again.
|
15:10:05
|
<rafa> You'll revert back to what was in the package.
|
15:10:50
|
<djazayeri> Actually in that case I'd like it to default to either merge OR omit, depending on what you chose in the initial "prefer merge or omit"
|
15:11:08
|
<djazayeri> but in either case, that should require confirmation (even for omit)
|
15:11:13
|
<djazayeri> basically that's a "conflict"
|
15:11:50
|
<rafa> So my suggestion is we will only have an option to "prefer merge"
|
15:11:56
|
<rafa> We'll omit by default
|
15:12:28
|
<djazayeri> I would prefer if we actually have a screen where the only question we ask is prefer omit (the default) vs prefer merge
|
15:12:40
|
<rafa> I see
|
15:12:44
|
<djazayeri> as radio buttons, and you click next to proceed.
|
15:12:46
|
<rafa> Okay
|
15:13:00
|
<rafa> It'll also work.
|
15:13:11
|
<djazayeri> so it's an explicit choice between "I trust myself more" (the default) and "I trust what I'm importing more"
|
15:13:40
|
<rafa> Good
|
15:14:16
|
<rafa> The last thing to decide is what we do with mapped things.
|
15:14:35
|
<djazayeri> so, things we mapped before, and are now importing a second version of
|
15:14:38
|
<rafa> I mean ones that do not have same uuids
|
15:14:48
|
<djazayeri> yes
|
15:15:13
|
<rafa> I think that if I choose map once, it should stay map in the next import and be confirmed
|
15:15:31
|
<djazayeri> What's the human interpretation of that?
|
15:15:41
|
<djazayeri> I have a WEIGHT-MINE concept
|
15:15:45
|
<djazayeri> I import a WEIGHT-THEIRS
|
15:15:50
|
<djazayeri> I choose "map"
|
15:16:10
|
<djazayeri> So, we're talking about the situation where I import WEIGHT-THEIRS again?
|
15:16:25
|
<rafa> yes
|
15:16:41
|
<rafa> for the first time we'll add mappings to WEIGHT-MINE
|
15:17:02
|
<rafa> for the second time WEIGHT-MINE will be used for everything in the package
|
15:17:05
|
<djazayeri> By "map" do you mean map-but-keep-mine?
|
15:17:08
|
<rafa> by default
|
15:17:11
|
<djazayeri> (as opposed to map-and-overwrite?)
|
15:17:13
|
<rafa> yes
|
15:17:35
|
*** dkayiwa has quit IRC
|
15:17:47
|
<djazayeri> Okay, I agree that if you chose map-and-keep-mine last time, that should persist.
|
15:17:58
|
<djazayeri> I mean, that should be the default if you get an update
|
15:18:32
|
<rafa> Will we ask to confirm based on dates? Or always confirm?
|
15:18:36
|
<djazayeri> Will we know the date modified of WEIGHT-THEIRS in the last import?
|
15:18:49
|
<rafa> Yes, we store that.
|
15:19:32
|
<rafa> So if we determine that the date modified has changed, we can actually ask to confirm
|
15:19:40
|
<rafa> Otherwise, mapping will be confirmed
|
15:19:48
|
<djazayeri> I agree with that
|
15:20:08
|
<djazayeri> the date modified is the same, confirm, otherwise ask.
|
15:20:18
|
<djazayeri> but still default to map-and-keep-mine
|
15:20:22
|
<rafa> Okay
|
15:20:46
|
<rafa> I think we can apply the same bahavior to map-and-overwrite
|
15:21:32
|
<rafa> Or maybe we should also look at existing date changed vs last import
|
15:21:46
|
*** vchircu has joined #openmrs
|
15:22:02
|
<djazayeri> so, the previous time I said map-and-overwite WEIGHT-MINE with WEIGHT-THEIRS
|
15:22:09
|
<djazayeri> then I get WEIGHT-THEIRS again.
|
15:22:28
|
<djazayeri> if the date-modified (for the previous import of WEIGHT-THEIRS vs the incoming one
|
15:22:44
|
<djazayeri> is the same -> could even omit, because in theory nothing has changed
|
15:22:57
|
<rafa> Oh right
|
15:23:10
|
<djazayeri> incoming is newer -> should overwrite
|
15:23:25
|
<djazayeri> (confirmation based on original global choice)
|
15:23:49
|
<djazayeri> existing is newer -> omit (require confirmation) ???
|
15:24:21
|
<rafa> yes, it would be similarly to the case with same uuids
|
15:24:36
|
*** bwolfe has quit IRC
|
15:25:59
|
<rafa> I think it's right.
|
15:26:12
|
*** vchircu has quit IRC
|
15:26:21
|
<djazayeri> actually, in the existing is newer case, if you said "I trust this import" it should probably default to overwrite
|
15:26:59
|
<rafa> Correct as with same uuids
|
15:27:06
|
<djazayeri> ok
|
15:28:32
|
<rafa> What do we do with skip, if possible?
|
15:28:50
|
<djazayeri> In which case?
|
15:29:02
|
<rafa> In case no replacement was chosen
|
15:29:06
|
<djazayeri> second time, where the first time they said skip?
|
15:29:37
|
<rafa> so I just don't want to include the thing
|
15:29:38
|
*** jkeiper is now known as chopin
|
15:30:07
|
<djazayeri> I think default to skip (again) but require confirmation
|
15:30:26
|
<rafa> Agree
|
15:31:07
|
<rafa> That should be a rare case anyway.
|
15:31:35
|
<rafa> Mostly the item will be required by some other item and we will create it anyway
|
15:32:26
|
<rafa> So let's assume our first choice was create new
|
15:32:34
|
<rafa> What do we do the next time?
|
15:32:57
|
<rafa> It should be the same situation as with same uuids, right?
|
15:33:08
|
<djazayeri> i.e. depends on date modified?
|
15:34:30
|
<djazayeri> I think if the date-modified is equal, we can omit with no confirmation
|
15:34:56
|
<djazayeri> if incoming is newer, we overwrite (with confirmation depending on the global choice)
|
15:36:20
|
<djazayeri> if existing is newer, thenâ¦if I said "trust the import" then we merge with no confirmation. If I said "trust mine" we omit, with confirmation.
|
15:36:58
|
<djazayeri> (Is this decision tree getting too complicated? and perhaps inconsistent? maybe we need to put this in a google spreadsheet, or an etherpad doc)
|
15:37:36
|
<rafa> No it's okay, we're quite consistent :)
|
15:37:52
|
<rafa> I'm comparing with my notes actually.
|
15:38:48
|
<rafa> Perfect, that's it.
|
15:40:04
|
<djazayeri> great
|
15:40:20
|
<djazayeri> What's the state of the module now, btw? If I check it out will it run?
|
15:40:35
|
<djazayeri> I had a few trivial UI comments from the demo, e.g. some things need borders and shading.
|
15:41:14
|
<rafa> Yes, it'll run but you need OpenMRS 1.6.3 with a small fix to actually be able to finish importing.
|
15:41:31
|
<r-friedman> djazayeri: you're right, i'd say omit not merge
|
15:41:34
|
<rafa> I've issued a ticket for that fix.
|
15:41:46
|
<rafa> I'll back port it to all versions
|
15:41:56
|
*** downeym_ has joined #openmrs
|
15:41:56
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o downeym_
|
15:42:16
|
<djazayeri> r-friedman: I hope it wasn't too painful to read that whole thread.
|
15:42:26
|
<rafa> :)
|
15:42:37
|
<r-friedman> rafa: it looks like a person can choose merge once, then map the next time around, so you have a map pointing to itself
|
15:43:01
|
<r-friedman> djazayeri: you're just a very transparent person, i only have to read half
|
15:43:06
|
<djazayeri> rafa: actually, looking back at the part that roger was referring to...
|
15:43:17
|
<djazayeri> I think we should make it depend on the global choice
|
15:43:28
|
<djazayeri> if they said "trust incoming" it defaults to merge
|
15:43:33
|
<djazayeri> if they said "trust mine" it defaults to omit
|
15:43:42
|
<djazayeri> does that make sense in that context?
|
15:43:52
|
<rafa> djazayeri: yes
|
15:44:00
|
<r-friedman> if i'm doing it, i trust mine, if you're doing it i trust incoming
|
15:44:22
|
<rafa> r-friedman: yes, you can choose map, but it won't hurt
|
15:45:14
|
<r-friedman> what about the next time? or what about adding imported cross-maps?
|
15:45:28
|
<rafa> r-friedman: map adds only mappings, which were added while merging anyway
|
15:46:05
|
<r-friedman> ok, so the import has a concept and its map to snomed
|
15:46:21
|
<r-friedman> the existing has a concept and its map to snomed
|
15:46:42
|
*** downeym has quit IRC
|
15:46:42
|
*** downeym_ is now known as downeym
|
15:46:54
|
<r-friedman> the first time it's merged, so the concept data and maps now look like the import
|
15:47:22
|
<r-friedman> the second time it's mapped, so that there's a map from the concept to the existing concept plus a map from snomed to the imported map
|
15:48:30
|
<r-friedman> assuming that we are modifying getConcept to follow mapping chains as well as id matches, won't we get multiple responses from the concept_map table when we expect a singleton?
|
15:49:56
|
<rafa> djazayeri: Darius, can you help me with that? I'm not that familiar with cross-maps.
|
15:50:49
|
<djazayeri> can we contrive an example for this r-friedman?
|
15:51:19
|
<r-friedman> ok, we have C1=long nosehair
|
15:51:26
|
<djazayeri> I have WEIGHT (with no maps). I import WEIGHT-MVP (which has maps to it's mvp id and snomed id)
|
15:51:35
|
<djazayeri> the first time I say "merge"
|
15:51:56
|
<djazayeri> so now I have WEIGHT-MVP (with 2 mappings, though it has my uuid, not theirs)
|
15:52:13
|
<r-friedman> ok so the existing WEIGHT has become WEIGHT_MVP and there's a map from WEIGHT (SNOMED) to WEIGHT_MVP
|
15:52:28
|
<r-friedman> now we import again and map
|
15:52:47
|
<r-friedman> do we still have WEIGHT?
|
15:52:58
|
<r-friedman> or only WEIGHT_MVP?
|
15:53:05
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: New Changeset: OpenMRS (trunk): Add checkstyle check for "new Date().getTime()" - TRUNK-1602... <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/lXc4bU8tgyw/OpenMRS> || New Changeset: OpenMRS (localize-setup-wizard): TRUNK-2055 : localized testingsetup.vm page and additional error messages for test installation <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/B45CNqZtb44/OpenMRS> || New Changeset: OpenMRS (trunk): Unable to Save New Concept in Indonesia Locale - TRUNK-2424 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/8GYlCkdRLbI/OpenMRS>
|
15:53:05
|
<djazayeri> import it coming from whom? re-import the same package? import a new version from mvp? Import a form from someone else that includes an old version of the concpet? (does it matter?)
|
15:53:38
|
<r-friedman> yikes
|
15:53:44
|
<djazayeri> since we did the merge, we overwrote WEIGHT with WEIGHT-MVP. (rafa does it preserve both names?)
|
15:53:59
|
<r-friedman> hold on, phone call
|
15:54:00
|
<djazayeri> though it keeps the uuid of our original WEIGHT.
|
15:54:03
|
<djazayeri> okay
|
15:54:04
|
<rafa> yes, it does
|
15:54:14
|
<docpaul> :)
|
15:54:18
|
*** docpaul has left #openmrs
|
15:54:30
|
<djazayeri> btw, rafa "merge" is confusing terminology. It's merging the collections, but overwriting the properties
|
15:54:31
|
*** docpaul has joined #openmrs
|
15:54:35
|
<djazayeri> I'd prefer to call this overwrite.
|
15:54:36
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o docpaul
|
15:55:05
|
<docpaul> busy busy developers. :)
|
15:55:10
|
<r-friedman> do we need both "merge" and "replace"?
|
15:55:36
|
<djazayeri> r-friedman: the problem is that rafa is using "merge" to mean the idea of "replace"
|
15:55:46
|
<djazayeri> I think it should be called "overwrite" personally
|
15:56:01
|
<r-friedman> with replace, we're adopting the imported concept, we're hitching our wagon to that star and we're abandoning ours, we'll accept any imports from that source with the imported UUID
|
15:56:03
|
<djazayeri> the trickiness is that it overwrites simple properties, but merges collections.
|
15:56:35
|
<rafa> djazayeri: Yes, I've changed that to "overwrite" in the UI already. I just can't switch myselft to the "overwrite" term ;)
|
15:57:04
|
<r-friedman> with merge, we're keeping our concept but only adding a map to our concept and merging in collections
|
15:57:15
|
<djazayeri> roger's interpretation is natural though
|
15:57:25
|
<djazayeri> so let's please stop using the word "merge"
|
15:57:37
|
<djazayeri> r-friedman: we actually don't have an option that does what you describe
|
15:58:00
|
<r-friedman> of course, the collection members have to come in first before the collection because they too could match existing concepts
|
15:58:33
|
<djazayeri> what rafal calls "map" is what's in the UI as "map-but-keep-mine". This still does add the mapping though.
|
15:59:00
|
<djazayeri> There's no weaker mechanism to say "substitute mine for this, but do NOT add the mapping"
|
15:59:27
|
<djazayeri> There's the much stronger mechanism to say "map-and-overwrite-mine" (what rafa has been calling "merge")
|
15:59:30
|
<r-friedman> what are the downstream implications? is every object that references the concept being overwriten going to be edited?
|
15:59:58
|
<r-friedman> or will the concept id stay the same?
|
16:00:13
|
<djazayeri> every other object in the incoming metadata package will have "mine" substituted for the incoming item.
|
16:00:36
|
<djazayeri> In any of those cases the conceptId (or other pk for other metadata types) doesn't change
|
16:00:39
|
<djazayeri> neither does the uuid.
|
16:00:45
|
<djazayeri> so we don't need to change obs.
|
16:01:17
|
<djazayeri> If you were to have a numeric concept and you were to overwrite it with a text concept, this would cause obs to break.
|
16:01:35
|
*** mandric_ has joined #openmrs
|
16:01:35
|
<djazayeri> we're not currently preventing that, but we know where we'll eventually insert that in code, when we have time.
|
16:01:36
|
*** mandric has quit IRC
|
16:01:36
|
*** mandric_ is now known as mandric
|
16:02:36
|
<r-friedman> to make sure i understand: if incoming and existing have same uuid and i say overwrite then the existing payload is replaced by the incoming payload
|
16:03:19
|
<djazayeri> so, the very first logical branch is: is there an existing item with exactly the same uuid.
|
16:03:19
|
<r-friedman> or is change date logic involved here as well?
|
16:03:42
|
<djazayeri> If there is (i.e. these are the same object identity by defiinition)...
|
16:04:00
|
<djazayeri> yes, rafa proposed some date changed logic. let me look back up for it
|
16:04:11
|
<r-friedman> (the little mysql problem notwithstanding)
|
16:04:48
|
<djazayeri> indeed, notwithstanding that
|
16:05:16
|
<djazayeri> basically the proposal is that we go based on dateModified. (It's not perfect, because of last-change-wins issues, but we don't have a better way)
|
16:05:56
|
<djazayeri> Further, I've said that the very first step of the import should be to ask you to choose between "trust my existing items" (the default) or "trust the import"
|
16:06:22
|
<djazayeri> the latter option is for people who are trying to centrally push out metadata changes to other sites they control
|
16:06:45
|
<djazayeri> the former is for people who are sharing metadata across ownership/control boundaries.
|
16:06:47
|
<r-friedman> it's worse than last change wins. it means that significant local changes have to cause the uuid to change
|
16:07:36
|
<r-friedman> you can only make significant changes on the machine that is the source
|
16:07:50
|
<djazayeri> but this is peer to peer
|
16:08:00
|
<djazayeri> we don't actually know the original source
|
16:08:13
|
<djazayeri> and we have no control once someone else imports it
|
16:08:27
|
<r-friedman> i thought we were keeping all source chains
|
16:08:47
|
<djazayeri> (I agree that what you're saying would be a nice feature, but I don't see how we can provide it via metadata sharing.)
|
16:09:22
|
<r-friedman> i think it's key to what you were saying about accepting a form with an old version of a concept
|
16:09:44
|
<djazayeri> I don't think you can tell whether something is originally yours or not.
|
16:10:11
|
<r-friedman> anything you change is yours -- you break it, you own it
|
16:10:12
|
<djazayeri> and even if you knew it wasn't, there's no real way for the module to prevent you from modifying it in the concept dictionary if you want
|
16:11:08
|
<r-friedman> right, it's just no longer the concept it used to be
|
16:11:23
|
<djazayeri> okay, but that's a bigger issue than just metadata sharing
|
16:11:50
|
<r-friedman> it's the same issue rearing its ugly head in a different context
|
16:12:09
|
<djazayeri> i.e. if changing a concept's datatype needs to change its uuid, probably it will break obs, so we need a way to prevent this.
|
16:12:20
|
<djazayeri> but it's not rafal's problem to solve in this module version.
|
16:12:43
|
<r-friedman> yah, can we have a version in concept map?
|
16:12:53
|
<r-friedman> or concept source?
|
16:13:21
|
<r-friedman> so that if I have received MVP version 6 and i receive a form with MVP version 5 then I know I can use 6 with no problem
|
16:13:36
|
<djazayeri> interesting suggestion
|
16:14:26
|
<djazayeri> so, we'd previous decided that you have something like "Local Dictionary: Darius's Laptop" -> 5089, or "MVP" -> 1234
|
16:14:40
|
<djazayeri> (those are the "tracking" mappings)
|
16:14:51
|
<r-friedman> right, and we version that
|
16:14:56
|
<djazayeri> you're suggesting that could be "MVP" -> "1234 v5"
|
16:15:07
|
<djazayeri> (or something like that)
|
16:15:36
|
<r-friedman> i'm a little concerned with having versions at the source level -- probably a good idea but a little abstruse
|
16:15:39
|
<djazayeri> so, concepts aren't currently versioned.
|
16:15:53
|
<djazayeri> well, they may be
|
16:16:02
|
<djazayeri> I'm proposing the version is in the *mapping* not the source
|
16:16:15
|
<djazayeri> so, there _is_ a version property on concept, but I don't know if people use it.
|
16:16:20
|
<djazayeri> (gotta run for a few)
|
16:16:33
|
<r-friedman> ok, ping me when you get back
|
16:19:26
|
*** chopin has quit IRC
|
16:23:14
|
<wyclif> djazayeri, after some careful thinkink about https://tickets.openmrs.org/browse/TRUNK-2426
|
16:24:25
|
<wyclif> i still think the new logic can still end up with duplicate order number in an extreme situation
|
16:24:33
|
<wyclif> mark 'EXTREME'
|
16:30:37
|
*** vchircu has joined #openmrs
|
16:30:53
|
<wyclif> on 2 application restarts, you are always going to have the same order number returned provided no new orders get saved between the restarts
|
16:31:45
|
<wyclif> so if it happens that a client calls the openmrs server for the next order id and them before it can make a request to save the order, the application is restarted meaning our static variable for order number is reset, so the subsequent call to get order number will return the very
|
16:32:29
|
<wyclif> sorry return a duplicate
|
16:33:02
|
<wyclif> and is the two calls are made for separate orders, then they will have duplicates
|
16:33:56
|
*** chopin has joined #openmrs
|
16:36:38
|
<wyclif> djazayeri, the work around could be to actually save it as a global property so that each time we call getNewOrderNumber, we persist the new value before returning
|
16:41:54
|
*** deadpool has joined #openmrs
|
16:45:40
|
*** guduji has quit IRC
|
16:50:34
|
*** rafa has quit IRC
|
16:51:34
|
<djazayeri> wyclif: the client should not be asking for an ordernumber
|
16:51:40
|
<djazayeri> it should be assigned when you save the order
|
16:52:02
|
*** cta has joined #openmrs
|
16:52:06
|
<cta> hello
|
16:52:29
|
<djazayeri> there's an edge case around fetching the next available order number from the database the first time you create an order
|
16:52:44
|
*** vchircu has quit IRC
|
16:53:05
|
<djazayeri> but the solution there is to just do that at application startup in a synchronized static block
|
16:53:56
|
<djazayeri> wyclif: just put javadoc on the getNextOrderNumber saying "this method is only intended to be used by OpenMRS internally. Client or module code should *not* use it"
|
16:54:22
|
<djazayeri> r-friedman: back
|
16:54:36
|
<r-friedman> hey
|
16:54:38
|
*** vchircu has joined #openmrs
|
16:55:05
|
<r-friedman> so there's a version in concept. we could take that over.
|
16:55:09
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: On Twitter: OpenMRS: RT @mwatha: @baobabhealth Bart app is now running on top of openmrs 1.7 .. @bawolfe this is so now :) <http://twitter.com/OpenMRS/statuses/86828608945012736>
|
16:55:26
|
<djazayeri> though in my experience people don't use concept.version at all
|
16:55:37
|
<djazayeri> (it needs to be manually changed)
|
16:56:15
|
<r-friedman> but i can easily see a protocol that could be used by curated repositories
|
16:56:41
|
<djazayeri> yes.
|
16:56:44
|
<r-friedman> doesn't help us with locations, though -- your state list example
|
16:56:59
|
<djazayeri> what we should really do is see whether Andy is currently keeping track of Version in the MVP dictionary
|
16:57:06
|
<djazayeri> if not, let's get him started.
|
16:57:12
|
<djazayeri> If so, let's see if we can leverage that.
|
16:58:03
|
<r-friedman> we should probably have a versoin in concept source as well
|
16:58:22
|
<r-friedman> it would be the front end of the full version kept in concept
|
16:58:34
|
<djazayeri> Currently I think people would have sources for "ICD-9" and "ICD-10"
|
16:58:57
|
<djazayeri> sources are only used for mappings though, not for local concepts
|
16:58:58
|
<r-friedman> plus MDR-TB example ... we are building it into HR Module as well
|
16:59:28
|
<r-friedman> you can't export metadata without having a local source id
|
16:59:48
|
<r-friedman> (unless you're only exporting others' concepts)
|
17:00:49
|
<r-friedman> i don't know what rafa's import history table looks like, maybe it could serve for all objects
|
17:01:28
|
<djazayeri> I think it's just class, uuid, (optional) local replacement uuid, last-date-imported
|
17:01:52
|
<r-friedman> so we add source and version
|
17:02:04
|
<r-friedman> source overlaps with concept source but includes other objects
|
17:02:31
|
<djazayeri> do a full history instead of just keeping the latest import?
|
17:02:43
|
<r-friedman> when we export our own objects, we count them as having been imported on the date of the export
|
17:02:47
|
<djazayeri> Makes sense. I'd need to wrap my head around it more.
|
17:03:10
|
<r-friedman> we don't need a full history i don't think
|
17:03:46
|
<r-friedman> so while you wrap your head around it, could you tell me what you had to do to handle the embedded objects in htmlforms?
|
17:03:50
|
<djazayeri> why does exporting an object count it as imported?
|
17:04:16
|
<djazayeri> is it because exporting an object means that you've "published" it?
|
17:04:25
|
<r-friedman> can't tell whether it arrived and was created or was created, machs nichts i think
|
17:04:49
|
<djazayeri> so, about htmlforms
|
17:04:56
|
<r-friedman> the important thing is to version the local objects
|
17:05:10
|
<djazayeri> the problem was to deal with the xml blob that says <obs conceptId="5089"/>
|
17:05:32
|
<djazayeri> because when you export that, 5089 becomes meaningless.
|
17:06:16
|
<r-friedman> the solution?
|
17:06:18
|
<djazayeri> The original approach Mark took was when we do the export, you convert that to <obs conceptId="some-long-uuid"/> and also include it in the manual "getDependencies" method or whatever we called it.
|
17:06:53
|
<djazayeri> That's still the approach, but since then we've also added the ability to say <obs conceptId="SNOMED:some-code"/>
|
17:07:41
|
<r-friedman> so can you generalize that to an interface?
|
17:07:43
|
<djazayeri> and with this additional mapping work we're doing, what we *could* do would be instead of replacing with the uuid, we replace with the mapping in the "local" source.
|
17:08:25
|
<djazayeri> The idea of being able to do extra on-export and on-import work for a metadata item is already generalized.
|
17:08:48
|
<djazayeri> for example xforms should be able to do the same thing
|
17:08:55
|
<djazayeri> I haven't worked with Daniel on that yet though.
|
17:09:37
|
<r-friedman> I'm thinking a lot about the new attribute model and complex concepts
|
17:27:17
|
*** chopin has quit IRC
|
17:39:51
|
*** chopin has joined #openmrs
|
17:42:17
|
*** bwolfe has joined #openmrs
|
17:42:17
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o bwolfe
|
17:43:12
|
<vchircu> hey guys, I'm having some trouble here and maybe you can help me
|
17:43:41
|
<vchircu> when I'm trying to build the OpenMRS web app it fails because it can't load the logic module
|
17:44:14
|
<vchircu> this is because it tries to create the logic module related tables in the DB, but they already exist
|
17:44:30
|
<djazayeri> vchircu: what openmrs version?
|
17:44:34
|
<vchircu> as a note, I'm working with the 1.9.0 snapshot, and I'm building a module
|
17:44:43
|
<vchircu> so I haven't change any of the trunk related code
|
17:44:57
|
<djazayeri> does it mention a liquibase changeset? or xml?
|
17:45:22
|
*** mathiaslin has quit IRC
|
17:46:19
|
<vchircu> 01-Jul-2011 20:25:57 liquibase.lock.LockHandler releaseLock INFO: Successfully released change log lock WARN - ModuleFactory.startModuleInternal(603) |2011-07-01 20:25:58,318| Error while trying to start module: logic org.openmrs.api.db.DAOException: Error while running sql: CREATE TABLE `logic_rule_definition` (..) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 . Message: Table 'logic_rule_definition' already exists at org.openmrs.util.Databa
|
17:47:34
|
*** rafa has joined #openmrs
|
17:47:34
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v rafa
|
17:48:08
|
<djazayeri> vchircu: what is the value of your global property logic.database_version
|
17:52:06
|
<vchircu> 1.0.0
|
18:00:21
|
<djazayeri> vchircu: we see this error *a lot*
|
18:00:27
|
<djazayeri> but I don't know where it comes from
|
18:00:40
|
<djazayeri> because all the tagged versions of the logic module in svn do _not_ create this
|
18:01:57
|
<vchircu> djazayeri: so what could be a work around ?
|
18:02:21
|
<djazayeri> If the table is empty, (or if you don't care what's in it) drop it
|
18:02:23
|
<vchircu> deleting the table directly from the DB ?
|
18:02:30
|
<vchircu> ok
|
18:02:32
|
<djazayeri> what logic_* tables do you have?
|
18:02:36
|
<vchircu> I'll do that
|
18:02:47
|
<djazayeri> can you check via mysql workbench or something? I'm curious to know.
|
18:03:37
|
<vchircu> djazayeri: rule_definition, rule_token, rule_token_tag, rule_token_registration, rule_token_registration_tag
|
18:05:00
|
<djazayeri> hmmâ¦did you ever run the rest web service module?
|
18:05:13
|
<vchircu> no, never
|
18:05:28
|
<djazayeri> what have you done so far, historically, with your database to get to this point?
|
18:05:39
|
<djazayeri> is it a recent install? or one with history?
|
18:05:48
|
<vchircu> nothing in particular
|
18:05:53
|
<vchircu> it is a recent install
|
18:06:15
|
<vchircu> I'm working on the atlas module, and the properties will be saved as global properties
|
18:06:16
|
<djazayeri> Do you remember what OpenMRS version you installed at?
|
18:06:29
|
<vchircu> 1.9.0
|
18:06:47
|
<vchircu> I think I installed it about 2 months ago
|
18:06:48
|
<djazayeri> hmmâ¦are you aware of the danger of calling saveGlobalProperties(List<GlobalProperty>)?
|
18:06:52
|
<djazayeri> i.e. have you ever done that?
|
18:07:01
|
<vchircu> yes
|
18:07:05
|
<vchircu> I have done that
|
18:07:12
|
*** yanokwa has quit IRC
|
18:07:14
|
<djazayeri> are you aware that that erases all global properties except for the ones you pass in?
|
18:07:36
|
<vchircu> no
|
18:07:38
|
<djazayeri> Basically that method is bad, and dangerous, and it's not documented in an obvious way.
|
18:07:56
|
<vchircu> so that's the problem
|
18:07:56
|
<djazayeri> It should never be used, except for on the "Manage Global Properties" page where it's actually saving all of them.
|
18:07:59
|
<djazayeri> So, that's the problem.
|
18:08:04
|
<djazayeri> We really need to deal with that.
|
18:08:16
|
<vchircu> I thought it would save a list of props
|
18:08:36
|
<djazayeri> That makes perfect sense.
|
18:08:36
|
<vchircu> thanks Darius
|
18:08:40
|
<djazayeri> Your interpretation, I mean.
|
18:08:47
|
<djazayeri> It's a really annoying bug in core.
|
18:09:07
|
<vchircu> and now, how can I restore the global properties table ?
|
18:09:21
|
<djazayeri> do you care what's in your database?
|
18:09:27
|
<djazayeri> can you just nuke the whole thing?
|
18:09:28
|
<vchircu> no
|
18:09:33
|
<vchircu> yes
|
18:09:37
|
<djazayeri> In that case, that's probably easiest.
|
18:09:41
|
<vchircu> I mean, I don't care
|
18:09:54
|
<vchircu> ok, I'll do that
|
18:10:01
|
<vchircu> thanks again for the help
|
18:10:04
|
<djazayeri> drop the database, delete your .OpenMRS/openmrs-runtime.properties file, and restart the webapp
|
18:10:05
|
<djazayeri> np
|
18:10:19
|
<djazayeri> bwolfe: do you know if there's a ticket for fixing the (evil) saveGlobalProperties(List) method?
|
18:10:24
|
*** bwolfe has quit IRC
|
18:16:41
|
*** james_regen has quit IRC
|
18:16:42
|
*** vchircu has quit IRC
|
18:32:49
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: New Changeset: OpenMRS (localize-setup-wizard): TRUNK-2055 : fixed after review comments <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/lJ-bnTwWv04/OpenMRS>
|
18:33:34
|
*** rafa has quit IRC
|
18:56:30
|
*** mandric has quit IRC
|
18:56:48
|
*** mandric has joined #openmrs
|
18:58:25
|
*** yanokwa has joined #openmrs
|
18:58:25
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v yanokwa
|
19:11:49
|
*** yanokwa has quit IRC
|
19:22:58
|
<r-friedman> djazayeri: you here?
|
19:23:08
|
<djazayeri> yes
|
19:23:22
|
<r-friedman> djazayeri: just looking at your post with C Zakian
|
19:23:37
|
<r-friedman> isn't there a regular way for a module to add its own objects to the hibernate session?
|
19:23:46
|
<djazayeri> That's not what he wants to do
|
19:24:02
|
<djazayeri> he's looking at changing the underlying hibernate configuration, e.g. to add the hibernate-search plugin
|
19:24:18
|
<djazayeri> or something like that, but I don't know the details.
|
19:24:34
|
<djazayeri> (I should have just asked him what he wanted to do exactly, rather than suggesting an inappropriate solution and saying don't use it.)
|
19:24:46
|
<r-friedman> oh, i was reading about that yesterday, you can just go ahead and set it in core, it imposes no burden unless it's actually used
|
19:25:07
|
<djazayeri> good to know, want to say that on the email thread?
|
19:25:24
|
<r-friedman> sure, get some community validation :)
|
19:37:43
|
*** downeym_ has joined #openmrs
|
19:37:43
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o downeym_
|
19:41:33
|
*** downeym has quit IRC
|
19:41:33
|
*** downeym_ is now known as downeym
|
19:55:21
|
*** bwolfe has joined #openmrs
|
19:55:21
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o bwolfe
|
19:55:22
|
*** bwolfe has quit IRC
|
19:55:42
|
*** bwolfe has joined #openmrs
|
19:55:42
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o bwolfe
|
20:05:37
|
*** docpaul has quit IRC
|
20:06:41
|
*** r-friedman has quit IRC
|
20:15:23
|
*** gbastien has quit IRC
|
20:29:31
|
*** rafa has joined #openmrs
|
20:29:38
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v rafa
|
20:44:39
|
<cta> bye guys
|
20:44:45
|
*** cta has quit IRC
|
20:52:51
|
*** chopin has quit IRC
|
20:53:11
|
<djazayeri> downeym: are we going to have an Unsupported Modules JIRA project before the long weekend?
|
20:53:24
|
<djazayeri> Or am I going to forget to check in my code on Tuesday?
|
20:53:27
|
<djazayeri> :-)
|
21:18:37
|
*** guduji has joined #openmrs
|
21:20:09
|
*** bwolfe has quit IRC
|
21:20:18
|
*** mandric has quit IRC
|
21:21:19
|
*** rafa has quit IRC
|
21:49:10
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: New Changeset: OpenMRS (order-entry): Follow up to Move assignment of orderNumber into OrderSaveHandler - TRUNK-2426 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/BlEmkHq4F4Q/OpenMRS>
|
21:52:11
|
*** wluyima has joined #openmrs
|
21:52:11
|
*** wyclif has quit IRC
|
22:00:39
|
*** downeym has quit IRC
|
22:07:34
|
*** mandric has joined #openmrs
|
22:24:22
|
*** wluyima has quit IRC
|
22:37:44
|
*** yanokwa has joined #openmrs
|
22:37:44
|
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v yanokwa
|
22:53:15
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: New Changeset: OpenMRS (order-entry): Adding missing precondition and comment for changeset that restores foreign key constraint on drug_order.order_id <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/nnUMuaK6JH8/OpenMRS> || New Changeset: OpenMRS (trunk): PatientSearch objects with filterClass belonging to a module aren't always properly decoded - TRUNK-2435 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/-ofwz7S3K0w/OpenMRS> || New Changeset: OpenMRS (1.7.x): PatientSearch objects with filterClass belonging to a module aren't always properly decoded - TRUNK-2435 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/xCoQPx4KKfI/OpenMRS> || New Changeset: OpenMRS (1.6.x): PatientSearch objects with filterClass belonging to a module aren't always properly decoded - TRUNK-2435 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/ld0YaynXjw4/OpenMRS> || New Changeset: OpenMRS (1.8.x): PatientSearch objects with filterClass belonging to a module aren't always properly decoded - TRUNK-2435 <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/ILfDWwL4WU8/OpenMRS> || New Changeset: OpenMRS (order-entry): Removing the deprecated ORDER_STATUS enumeration and removing references to it <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/lCYHo1HtYqE/OpenMRS>
|
23:21:00
|
*** wluyima has joined #openmrs
|
23:44:26
|
*** guduji has quit IRC
|
23:57:18
|
<OpenMRSBot> Recent updates in the world of openmrs: New Changeset: OpenMRS (order-entry): followup fix for TRUNK-2371 (should create a new ConceptClass for Order Set if we don't have one with the proper UUID, i... <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/J38WHI31f8Q/OpenMRS> || New Changeset: OpenMRS (order-entry): refactoring for TRUNK-2426 (moved some logic from the DAO to the Service layer) <http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OMRStrunk/~3/_VdjerjSlRQ/OpenMRS>
|